|
Post by MasterSnit on Jul 23, 2009 14:35:29 GMT -5
Did any of you guys watch the TNA PPV from last Sunday? Jesus Christ! That just might have been the worst wrestling PPV I have ever seen! From the very first match everything sucked. So many botches and missed spots and there seemed to be no intensity. To make things worse, Kurt Angle saying the MEM must win all of their matches or get fired gave the results away right there.
TNA PPV's are usually half decent, but this one was awful.
|
|
|
Post by Velkontés on Jul 24, 2009 0:31:35 GMT -5
I read that "Slammiversary" only had 7,000 PPV buys. "Impact" draws 1.5 million viewers. Clearly someone isn't doing their job right.
I'm not up to speed on these things, but is TNA okay financially? 7,000 PPV buys doesn't exactly scream "financial viability".
|
|
|
Post by Champ on Jul 24, 2009 8:37:45 GMT -5
Supposedly they are getting better every year financially. Plus, they can afford all these big stars with much less work rate than WWE. They must be doing something right with income. But, it is hard to imagine how they do in fact have the money to keep all these fossils happy
|
|
|
Post by MasterSnit on Jul 26, 2009 16:20:38 GMT -5
Their PPVs are usually pretty solid. This one just blowed. And 7,000 doesn't sound too good.
|
|
|
Post by Naitch on Jul 27, 2009 14:09:36 GMT -5
7,000 does sound like a low number. Not that I would know they're buy rates.
|
|
|
Post by Champ on Jul 29, 2009 14:15:33 GMT -5
Put it this way. This year's WWE Judgment Day PPV had 221,000 buyrates and that was considered a disappointment because it went down 30,000 buys from last year's Judgment day. So, 7,000 truly sucks donkey balls from what it seems
|
|