|
|
Post by Snitskyman2016 on May 19, 2013 17:46:49 GMT -5
Is better built up than Wrestlemania. We know why all these matches are happening except Kofi vs Dean.
|
|
|
|
Post by MasterSnit on May 23, 2013 5:37:25 GMT -5
Many of the WrestleMania feuds have seemed a bit undercooked in recent years. By the time they get to Extreme Rules they seem more interesting. However, a lot of them are rematches and if we got a card with a lot of rematches at WrestleMania I'm sure we would moan about that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Champ on May 25, 2013 23:06:08 GMT -5
I actually have to agree with SM to an extent that it actually almost felt like more time was put into each match after wrestlemania leading up to extreme rules, whereas wrestlemania felt like the swagger/del rio, trips/Brock buildup. Punk/taker could have been given way more juice. Even cena and rock felt like it had crappy buildup. Then again there's the argument that this match has been quietly built up for a year. Every other match for mania sort have felt thrown together like they didn't know what to do with everyone else.
It actually felt like orton/show, sheamus/Henry, ryback/cena, Jericho/fandango all had solid buildups from the day after mania. Dean Ambrose vs kofi was definitely kind of random like why did HE get that title shot? Lol but kofi and hell no have had beef with the shield and you can tell it was to get gold on each shield member. Truthfully the one with the shittiest build was Brock vs trips because its damn near impossible to get both fuckin guys in an arena at the same time.
But this had me thinking. Extreme rules took place 6 weeks after mania. That's a lot longer than the typical 3-4 weeks they go between ppvs. Because of that I felt like we've been waiting for extreme rules as opposed to, oh there's a ppv tonight? What's the name of it again? It holds so much more merit when they actually make us wait a few extra weeks. I'd prefer every 2 months at the least
|
|
