|
|
Post by evilmasterbetty on Oct 26, 2008 20:57:01 GMT -5
Its almost like MB was Guy's lawyer.; Shit, I'd make sure he got full rights to whatever kids he wants (probably just the white ones) and I would have gotten him half. |
|
|
|
Post by Naitch on Oct 26, 2008 21:09:15 GMT -5
Madonna needs kids rights too man.
I mean someone has to watch them when Guy is off making another great movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by evilmasterbetty on Oct 26, 2008 21:26:16 GMT -5
Madonna needs kids rights too man. I mean someone has to watch them when Guy is off making another great movie. hmmm that's true. She'll have visitation, don't get me wrong, but I wouldn't trust kids with someone who actually likes A-Rod...I mean, what kind of judgment is that? |
|
|
|
Post by Naitch on Oct 27, 2008 8:01:46 GMT -5
Its not very good judgment thats for damn sure. She could at least like Roger Clemens or someone with some creditability.
|
|
|
|
Post by Velkontés on Oct 27, 2008 18:12:41 GMT -5
Its almost like MB was Guy's lawyer.; Shit, I'd make sure he got full rights to whatever kids he wants (probably just the white ones) and I would have gotten him half. I hate to be the boring asshole again, but Guy was/is never going to get half of everything. It's complicated, but he'd essentially be in line for 50% of whatever she/they made *since* they got married, assuming they are equal partners in the family household, which English law presumes they are. As he has a successful career making shitty movies it's unlikely he would be granted palimony, unless he were to get custody of the kids, then it gets complex. A good rule of thumb would be the swag Heather Mills bagged from old man McCartney. And his movies really are shit. |
|
|
|
Post by MasterSnit on Oct 27, 2008 18:18:40 GMT -5
Sounds like you've been studying the most recent OK! magazines, V.
By the way, what films did this Guy make?
|
|
|
|
Post by evilmasterbetty on Oct 27, 2008 21:02:09 GMT -5
Shit, I'd make sure he got full rights to whatever kids he wants (probably just the white ones) and I would have gotten him half. I hate to be the boring asshole again, but Guy was/is never going to get half of everything. It's complicated, but he'd essentially be in line for 50% of whatever she/they made *since* they got married, assuming they are equal partners in the family household, which English law presumes they are. As he has a successful career making shitty movies it's unlikely he would be granted palimony, unless he were to get custody of the kids, then it gets complex. A good rule of thumb would be the swag Heather Mills bagged from old man McCartney. And his movies really are shit. I wasn't sure what English law is on this, but yeah he was probably never getting half. There are some states in the US, most notably California, where once you're married the assets all become one and are split evenly on divorce, even if the one person is dirt poor going in. This is why almost everyone in Hollywood gets prenups (not just because they're worth millions). |
|
|
|
Post by Naitch on Oct 28, 2008 7:49:37 GMT -5
Sounds like you've been studying the most recent OK! magazines, V. By the way, what films did this Guy make? That I know of Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels (it was pretty good film), Snatch (it was friggin awesome) and some movie called Rockenrolla thats coming out soon. |
|
